The effect of cervical pessary on increasing gestational age at delivery in twin pregnancies with asymptomatic short cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Objective: The incidence of preterm delivery is much higher in twin pregnancies than in singletons and even higher if a short cervical length is detected in the second trimester. Studies are contradictory regarding the efficacy of a cervical pessary to decrease preterm birth in twin pregnancies and short cervical length. To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the efficacy of cervical pessary in prolonging gestation, preventing preterm birth, and reducing adverse neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies with an asymptomatic short cervix. Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.org were searched for randomized controlled trials from inception to June 2023. Study eligibility criteria: In this study, randomized controlled trials comparing the cervical pessary to expectant management in the pregnant population with twin gestations and asymptomatic short cervix were included. Methods: The Cochrane risk-of-bias-2 tool for randomized controlled trials was used for the evaluation of the risk of bias in included studies. A meta-analysis was performed by calculating risk ratio and mean difference with their 95% confidence interval using the random effects model or fixed effect model on the basis of heterogeneity and accounting for potential covariates among the included randomized controlled trials. Results: A total of 6 randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. Cervical pessary did not significantly increase the gestational age at delivery in twin pregnancies with asymptomatic patients (mean difference, 0.36 weeks [-0.27 to 0.99]; P=.270; I2=72.0%). Moreover, the cervical pessary use did not result in a reduction of spontaneous or all-preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation (risk ratio, 0.88 [0.77-1.00]; P=.061; I2=0.0%). There was no statistically significant difference in the composite neonatal adverse outcomes (risk ratio, 1.001 [0.86-1.16]; P=.981; I2=20.9%), including early respiratory morbidity, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and confirmed sepsis. Conclusion: The use of cervical pessary in twin pregnancies with asymptomatic short cervix does not seem to be effective in increasing the gestational age at delivery, preventing preterm birth, or reducing adverse neonatal outcomes. This indicates that alternative interventions should be sought for the management of this patient population.

Evidence-based cesarean delivery: preoperative management (part 7).

Preoperative preparation for cesarean delivery is a multistep approach for which protocols should exist at each hospital system. These protocols should be guided by the findings of this review. The interventions reviewed and recommendations made for this review have a common goal of decreasing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality related to cesarean delivery. The preoperative period starts before the patient's arrival to the hospital and ends immediately before skin incision. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends showering with either soap or an antiseptic solution at least the night before a procedure. Skin cleansing in addition to this has not been shown to further decrease rates of infection. Hair removal at the cesarean skin incision site is not necessary, but if preferred by the surgical team then clipping or depilatory creams should be used rather than shaving. Preoperative enema is not recommended. A clear liquid diet may be ingested up to 2 hours before and a light meal up to 6 hours before cesarean delivery. Consider giving a preoperative carbohydrate drink to nondiabetic patients up to 2 hours before planned cesarean delivery. Weight-based intravenous cefazolin is recommended 60 minutes before skin incision: 1-2 g intravenous for patients without obesity and 2 g for patients with obesity or weight ≥80 kg. Adjunctive azithromycin 500 mg intravenous is recommended for patients with labor or rupture of membranes. Preoperative gabapentin can be considered as a way to decrease pain scores with movement in the postoperative period. Tranexamic acid (1 g in 10-20 mL of saline or 10 mg/kg intravenous) is recommended prophylactically for patients at high risk of postpartum hemorrhage and can be considered in all patients. Routine use of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is recommended preoperatively and is to be continued until the patient is ambulatory. Music and active warming of the patient, and adequate operating room temperature improves outcomes for the patient and neonate, respectively. Noise levels should allow clear communication between teams; however, a specific decibel level has not been defined in the data. Patient positioning with left lateral tilt decreases hypotensive episodes compared with right lateral tilt, which is not recommended. Manual displacers result in fewer hypotensive episodes than left lateral tilt. Both vaginal and skin preparation should be performed with either chlorhexidine (preferred) or povidone iodine. Placement of an indwelling urinary catheter is not necessary. Nonadhesive drapes are recommended. Cell salvage, although effective for high-risk patients, is not recommended for routine use. Maternal supplemental oxygen does not improve outcomes. A surgical safety checklist (including a timeout) is recommended for all cesarean deliveries.

One-step vs. two-step gestational diabetes mellitus screening and pregnancy outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes of patients screened with one-step or two-step screening methods for GDM. DATA SOURCES: Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and LILACS were searched from inception up to September 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Studies that had overlapping populations were excluded (PROSPERO CRD42022358903). STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Risk ratios (RR) were computed with 95% confidence intervals (CI) by two authors. Unpublished data were requested. Large for gestational age (LGA) was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The search yielded 394 citations. Seven RCTs met inclusion criteria. A total of 54,650 participants were screened for GDM by either the one-step method (N=27,163) or the two-step method (N=27,487). For LGA, there were no significant differences found between groups (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.93-1.05; I2=0%). Newborns of patients in one-step testing had higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 1.24; 95% CI 1.14-1.34; I2 =0%) and NICU admissions (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.04-1.21; I2=0%). Patients in the one-step group were more likely to be diagnosed with GDM (RR 1.73; 95% CI 1.44-2.09; I2=80%). In addition, among trials that tested all patients prior to and excluded patients with pregestational diabetes, newborns were more likely to have macrosomia (RR 1.27; 95% CI 1.21- 1.34; I2=0%). Overall risk of bias assessment was of low concern. CONCLUSIONS: LGA did not differ between patients screened by one-step method and those by two-step method. However, patients randomized to one-step method had higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia and NICU admission as well as maternal GDM diagnosis than the two-step method.

Universal cervical length screening and risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of spontaneous preterm birth with or without universal transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening at the time of midtrimester scan. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science were systematically searched from the inception of the databases to November 12, 2023, using combinations of the relevant medical subject heading terms, key words, and word variants that were considered suitable for the topic. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies including individuals with singleton gestations at 16-25 weeks of gestation screened or not screened with universal transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening were considered eligible. Primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks; secondary outcomes were spontaneous preterm birth <34 and <32 weeks. METHODS: Random effect head-to-head analyses were used to directly compare each outcome, expressing the results as summary odds ratio and relative 95% confidence interval. The quality of the included studies was independently assessed by 2 reviewers, using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized controlled studies. The study was registered on the prospective register of systematic reviews database (PROSPERO) (registration number: CRD42022385325). RESULTS: Eight studies, including 447,864 pregnancies, were included in the meta-analysis (213,064 screened with transvaginal ultrasound cervical length and 234,800 unscreened). In the overall analysis, universal transvaginal ultrasound cervical length did not significantly decrease the spontaneous preterm birth rates <37 weeks (odds ratio, 0.92 [95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.01], P=.07) and <34 weeks (odds ratio, 0.87 [95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.04], P=.12), but was significantly associated with a lower risk of spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks (odds ratio, 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.94], P=.002). Individuals without a prior spontaneous preterm birth had a significantly lower risk of spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks (odds ratio, 0.88 [95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.97], P=.01) and a lower trend of spontaneous preterm birth <32 weeks (odds ratio, 0.82 [95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.01], P=.06) when screened with transvaginal ultrasound cervical length, compared with no screening. CONCLUSION: Universal transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening usually <24 weeks in singletons without a prior spontaneous preterm birth, is associated with a significant reduction in spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks, compared with no screening.

Birthweights at term have increased globally: insights from a systematic review of 183 million births.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess global trends in mean birthweights at term, as reported in peer-reviewed literature. DATA SOURCES: We electronically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to September 2023, using combinations of the search terms: "birth weight"; "birth-weight"; "birthweight"; "trend". There were no restrictions based on language or geographic area. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all ecological and observational studies reporting mean birthweight at term as a continuous numerical variable over time. METHODS: We assessed the quality of included studies using the Dufault and Klar checklist modified by Betran et al. Univariate and multivariate linear models were used to examine the effects of time (years) and geographical origins. Subgroup analyses focused on national data sources and on data collected from 1950 onward. RESULTS: Among 6447 reviewed articles, 29 met our criteria, reporting mean birthweight data from over 183 million infants worldwide. Most studies were hospital-based (48.3%), 44.8% used national data, and a minority used municipality, community, or regional data (6.9%). Geographically, North America (31.0%) had the highest representation, followed by Asia and Europe (27.6% each), and South America and Oceania (6.9% each). Our univariate linear regression model (Model 1) revealed a significant increase in mean birthweight at term over time (4.74 g/y; 95% confidence interval, 3.95-5.53; P<.001). Model 2, incorporating continental dummy variables into the first model, confirmed this trend (3.85 g/y; 95% confidence interval, 2.96-4.74; P<.001). Model 3, focusing on available national data, did not find a significant relationship. Model 4 narrowed its focus on records from 1950 onward, reporting a robust annual increase of 7.26 g/y (95% confidence interval, 6.19-8.33; P<.001). Model 5, adjusting for the number of participants included in each study, reported a conclusive mean term birthweight increase of 1.46 g/y (95% confidence interval, 0.74-2.18; P<.001). CONCLUSION: This systematic review of 29 studies shows an increase in term birthweights over time, particularly when considering data since 1950. Limitations include study quality variations, data source diversity, and data sparsity, underscoring the need for future research to use precise gestational age distinctions and predetermined time frames to gain a deeper understanding of this trend and its implications for maternal and child health.

Concurrent Progestogen and Cerclage to Reduce Preterm Birth: a multicenter international retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate whether cerclage with progestogen therapy was superior to cerclage alone in the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) in singleton pregnancies METHODS: : This is an international retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies, without major anomaly or aneuploidy, and with cerclage placed at 10 different institutions in the United States and Colombia from June 2016-June 2020. Exclusion criteria were: lack of documentation regarding whether progestogen was or was not prescribed, delivery outcome unavailable, and pregnancy termination (spontaneous or induced) prior to 16 weeks' gestation. Exposure of interest was progestogen use with cerclage placement, which included those who were continued on progestogen or who started progestogen after cerclage. Comparator was those without progestogen use after cerclage placement, which included those who had no progestogen use the whole pregnancy, or who initiated progestogen and then stopped it after cerclage placement. Progestogen type, cerclage indication, maternal baseline characteristics, and maternal/neonatal outcomes were collected. Primary outcome was sPTB <37 weeks. Secondary outcomes were sPTB <34 weeks, gestational age at delivery, composite neonatal outcome including ≥1 of the following: perinatal mortality, confirmed sepsis, Grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia. There was planned subgroup analyses by cerclage indication, progestogen type (vaginal progesterone vs 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC)), preterm birth history, and site. Continuous variables compared in adjusted analyses with ANCOVA and categorical variables compared with multivariable logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders with adjusted odds ratio (aOR). Cox regression survival curve was generated to compare latency to spontaneous delivery, censored after 37 weeks. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 699 singletons met inclusion, N=561 in the progestogen with cerclage group, and N=138 with cerclage alone. Baseline characteristics were similar, except those in the progestogen group were more likely to have had a prior sPTB (61% vs 41%, p<0.001). Within the progestogen group, 52% were on 17-OHPC weekly, 44% on vaginal progesterone daily, and 3% on oral progesterone daily. Progestogen with cerclage was associated with a significantly lower frequency of sPTB<37 (31% vs 39% aOR 0.59 (0.39 - 0.89), p=0.01) and <34 weeks (19% vs 27%, aOR 0.55 (0.35 - 0.87), p=0.01), increased latency to spontaneous delivery (Hazard ratio to sPTB <37wk, 0.66 (0.49-0.90), p=0.009), and lower frequency of perinatal death (7% vs 16%, aOR 0.37 (0.20-0.67), p=0.001). In planned subgroup analyses, association with reduced odds of preterm birth <37 weeks persisted in those on vaginal progesterone, those without a prior preterm birth, those with ultrasound or exam-indicated cerclage, those that started progestogen therapy prior to cerclage, and in sites restricted to the United States. CONCLUSION: Use of progestogen with cerclage was associated with reduced rates of sPTB and early sPTB compared to cerclage alone. Although not powered for subgroups, the strength of evidence for benefit appeared greatest for those with ultrasound or exam-indicated cerclage, and with vaginal progesterone.

Contractions of the lower uterine segment during transvaginal ultrasound cervical length: incidence, significance, proper measurement, and management.

An accurate transvaginal ultrasound cervical length is paramount to obtain the best prediction for preterm birth. Transvaginal ultrasound cervical length should be optimally obtained when a lower uterine segment contraction is not seen. For universal transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening at approximately 20 weeks of gestation, the options are to do the transvaginal ultrasound soon after bladder void (lower uterine segment contractions present in 16%-43% of this approach) or to wait until the end of the anatomy scan (ideally within 30 minutes after bladder voiding) to decrease the chance of a lower uterine segment contraction. If the lower uterine segment contraction persists even after waiting up to 20 minutes or more, only the true transvaginal ultrasound cervical length should be reported. In particular, in patients with a previous spontaneous preterm birth, if the lower uterine segment contraction persists, the transvaginal ultrasound cervical length can be repeated in ≤7 days even in the presence of a normal (>25 mm) cervical length. Similar to a blood pressure cuff that must be of the right size for proper blood pressure measurement and a glucometer that must be properly calibrated, screening with transvaginal ultrasound cervical length should only be performed following a proper and standardized technique, including avoiding as much as feasible the presence of lower uterine segment contractions.

Factors Associated with Provider Counseling Against Breastfeeding in the Setting of Marijuana Use: A Population-Based Survey.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to explore patient demographic factors associated with counseling against breastfeeding and concurrent marijuana use. METHODS: A cross-sectional study derived using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention administered Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) in collaboration with state and local health departments. This study sample included survey participants whose responses indicate they received counseling discouraging breastfeeding with concurrent marijuana use. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses assessed the relationship between factors associated with counseling against breastfeeding and concurrent marijuana use. RESULTS: Of the 10,911 participants in this sample, 9,695 participants who answered the question about receiving counseling discouraging breastfeeding while using marijuana were included in the analysis (89% response rate for the total sample). Twenty nine percent of participants were advised by a provider not to breastfeed while using marijuana. Participants who received this counseling were more likely to be people of color, age less than or equal to 29, with a high school education or less, unmarried, report governmental or no insurance prepregnancy, and report marijuana use postpartum. In the multivariate analysis, age less than or equal to 20 (P = .001), being unmarried (P = .023), and marijuana use postpartum (P = .034) remained associated with counseling against breastfeeding. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that individuals are being counseled differently. Unmarried and young people (age <20 years) were more likely to report receiving counseling against breastfeeding with concurrent marijuana use. Given the growing national acceptability of marijuana use, the known benefits of breastfeeding, and the unclear risks of marijuana in human milk, there is a need to standardize counseling to avoid a missed opportunity to educate breastfeeding populations who use marijuana and to reduce the risk of counseling based on providers' personal attitudes and biases not aligned with evidence-based guidelines.

Ultrasonographic cervical length assessment in pregnancies with placenta previa and risk of perinatal adverse outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between cervical length and the risk of adverse outcomes in placenta previa pregnancies. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of cervical length in predicting emergency cesarean delivery due to hemorrhage was evaluated. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were systematically searched up to January 21, 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational studies investigating the relationship between cervical length and maternal adverse outcomes in patients with placenta previa were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of cervical length measured at 28 to 34 weeks of gestation for the prediction of emergency cesarean delivery due to hemorrhage. The secondary outcomes were the probability of antenatal bleeding, preterm birth (both iatrogenic and spontaneous), and postpartum hemorrhage >2000 mL. Insufficient data were available on the transfusion procedure in cases where the cervical length was <30 mm. METHODS: For prognostic analysis, the random-effects model was used to pool the odds ratios and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. For the diagnostic part, we used a summary receiver-operating characteristic curve, pooled sensitivities and specificities, area under the curve, and summary likelihood ratios. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies presenting data on 1462 pregnancies with placenta previa were included. Cervical length ≤30 mm at 28 to 34 weeks of gestation had a sensitivity of 61% (95% confidence interval, 43-77), specificity of 83% (95% confidence interval, 76-88), and area under the curve of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.86) for the prediction of emergency cesarean delivery. Furthermore, cervical length ≤30 mm was associated with antenatal bleeding (odds ratio, 3.62; 95% confidence interval, 2.09-6.26; P<.001; I2=54.8%), preterm birth (odds ratio, 8.46; 95% confidence interval, 3.05-23.44; P<.001; I2=83.6%), and postpartum hemorrhage (odds ratio, 6.89; 95% confidence interval, 4.51-10.53; P<.001; I2=0.00%). CONCLUSION: Short cervical length (≤30 mm) measured at 28 to 34 weeks of gestation can assist in predicting the risk of emergency cesarean delivery due to hemorrhage in pregnancies with placenta previa. Furthermore, short cervical length is significantly associated with the risk of antenatal bleeding, preterm birth, and postpartum hemorrhage in pregnancies with placenta previa.

Misoprostol with balloon vs oxytocin with balloon in high-risk pregnancy induction: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancies at high risk for maternal, fetal, or placental complications often necessitate induction of labor in the late preterm or early term period for delivery. Limited data exist on the safest method of induction to use in this specific patient population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the combination of oxytocin plus a Cook balloon vs misoprostol plus a Cook balloon for induction of labor in high-risk pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an open-label, randomized controlled trial at a single institution from July 2020 to May 2022. The study was approved by the institutional review board and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04492072). Individuals with a high-risk pregnancy, at least ≥22 weeks' gestation, with a singleton in cephalic presentation, Bishop score ≤6, and intact membranes were offered enrollment. A high-risk pregnancy was defined as a pregnancy with any of the following complications: hypertensive disease of pregnancy, fetal growth restriction, oligohydramnios, suspected placental abruption requiring delivery, uncontrolled pregestational diabetes, or abnormal biophysical profile or nonstress test requiring delivery. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. Secondary maternal outcomes included induction to delivery interval, number of vaginal deliveries within 24 hours, rates of uterine tachysystole, intraamniotic infection, operative vaginal delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage. Secondary fetal outcomes included fetal heart rate abnormalities, stillbirth, Apgar scores <7 at 5 minutes, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, arterial umbilical blood pH <7.1, sepsis, and neonatal death. A subgroup analysis was planned for the primary outcome to assess the different indications for cesarean delivery. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: During the 22 months of the trial, a total of 150 patients were randomized, and 73 (49%) of those were induced with oxytocin and a Cook balloon and 77 (51%) were induced with misoprostol and a Cook balloon. There was no significant difference in the overall rate of cesarean delivery between the study groups, (21.9% vs 31.1%; relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.21), nor among those for which the cesarean delivery was performed for a specific indication. There were no differences in the secondary maternal and fetal or neonatal adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: In high-risk pregnancies, the rate of cesarean delivery and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were similar for induction of labor with oxytocin and a Cook balloon and for induction with misoprostol and a Cook balloon.

Planned cesarean delivery vs planned vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: There are over 145 million births worldwide, with over 30 million cesarean deliveries yearly. There are limited data comparing the perinatal and maternal outcomes between planned cesarean delivery and planned vaginal delivery. This study aimed to evaluate perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality by meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that randomly assigned patients to either planned cesarean delivery or planned vaginal delivery. DATA SOURCES: Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and the World Health Organization clinical trial databases were searched from inception through August 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials that compared planned cesarean delivery with planned vaginal delivery at any gestational age and for any delivery indication were included. METHODS: Two authors independently extracted data. PRISMA guidelines were used for data extraction and quality assessment. The primary outcome was perinatal mortality. The summary measures were reported as relative risks or as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effects models for outcomes. RESULTS: In 15 primary randomized controlled trials, 3265 patients were randomized to planned cesarean delivery and 3353 to planned vaginal delivery. The incidence of perinatal deaths was not different (1.3% vs 1.3%; relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-1.52). Planned cesarean delivery was associated with lower neonatal incidences of low umbilical artery pH (0.3% vs 2.4%; relative risk, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.67), birth trauma (0.3% vs 0.7%; relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.96), tube feeding requirement (2.5% vs 7.1%; relative risk, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.66), and hypotonia (0.4% vs 3.5%; relative risk, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.47), compared to planned vaginal delivery. Chorioamnionitis was less frequent in the planned cesarean delivery group (0.3% vs 1.0%; relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.98). Wound infection was more common in the planned cesarean delivery group (1.9% vs 1.1%; relative risk, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.52). Lower rates were observed in the planned cesarean delivery group for urinary incontinence at both ≤3 months (8.7% vs 12.2%; relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.85) and 1 to 2 years (16.9% vs 22%; relative risk, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.88) and for a painful perineum at 2 years (4% vs 6.2%; relative risk, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.87) compared to planned vaginal delivery. Among singleton pregnancies, planned cesarean delivery was associated with a lower rate of perinatal death (0.69% vs 1.81%; relative risk, 0.45; 95% confident interval, 0.21-0.93). CONCLUSION: Planned cesarean delivery and planned vaginal delivery were associated with similar rates of perinatal and maternal mortality in this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Planned cesarean delivery was associated with significant decreases in adverse neonatal outcomes such as low umbilical artery pH, birth trauma, tube feeding requirement, and hypotonia, and significant decreases in chorioamnionitis, urinary incontinence, and painful perineum. Planned vaginal delivery was associated with significant decreases in need for general anesthesia and wound infection. Further randomized trials are needed to assess the risks and benefits of planned cesarean delivery vs planned vaginal delivery in lower-risk patients and in the general population.

Vaginal progesterone for the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth.

After the United States Food and Drug Administration pulled 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate from the market for its use in prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth, national societies have had mixed recommendations regarding the management of patients with a singleton pregnancy and previous spontaneous preterm birth. Herein we highlight the randomized trial data and translational evidence supporting the use of vaginal progesterone for prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. Prophylactic vaginal progesterone starting at 16 weeks and 0 days every night should be offered to patients with singletons and previous singleton spontaneous preterm birth regardless of cervical length, and continued along with placement of cerclage if a transvaginal ultrasound cervical length ≤25 mm is detected at <24 weeks.